From 9bf3ee722c338f367a65a75ec4d2353f259bc2af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Robinson Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 06:10:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a function comment about a return value --- Alc/ALu.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Alc/ALu.c b/Alc/ALu.c index acd5de06..72c3dd60 100644 --- a/Alc/ALu.c +++ b/Alc/ALu.c @@ -332,9 +332,7 @@ void aluSelectPostProcess(ALCdevice *device) } -/* Prepares the interpolator for a given rate (determined by increment). A - * result of AL_FALSE indicates that the filter output will completely cut - * the input signal. +/* Prepares the interpolator for a given rate (determined by increment). * * With a bit of work, and a trade of memory for CPU cost, this could be * modified for use with an interpolated increment for buttery-smooth pitch